CLUTTER
& CREDIBILITY - Trust between Reader and Poet
CLUTTER
CLUES
One thing that helps us in our efforts to write simple, focused, uncluttered
haiku is trust in our readers' intelligence and their accumulated knowledge. We
can expect them to know that a body of water on a bright day reflects sunlight,
drifting clouds, and other things; that lemons are normally yellow, healthy
lawns are green, winter wind is cold, that even winter sunlight can sometimes be
warm, dogs bark, cats purr, and so on.
What is wrong with this haiku (besides its being a single sentence and a
linear statement)?
warmed by the sun
kids pile hot woolen coats
next to playground toys
A successful haiku does not need to *explain* an action or effect to readers.
Giving readers credit for knowing as much as I do about the effects of sun and
exercise, even in winter, I can remove the clutter of unnecessary adjectives
that are overloading the verse with excessive and redundant kigo. The poem needs
sharper focus, and exchanging a more specific noun for the playground toys will
help. The freed-up space can be used for a setting or another independent
image---a separate topic to create juxtaposition and stronger resonance. I can
accomplish this by looking back to find something else meaningful in my
experience that can be included:
Christmas Day
a pile of shed coats
next to the jungle gym
I know you knew I would get around to juxtaposition sooner or later.
This version of another real experience does not show readers anything new:
nasty smell
rotten peaches
in a red bowl
IF there is a real need to inform readers of the cause (or explanation) of an
occurrence, then both cause and effect should be in one part of the haiku as an
independent image, with an entirely separate image in the other part. In that
way, one can still achieve juxtaposition and resonance.
The rotten peaches explain the nasty smell. There is only one image (topic) or
situation, that of the malodorous peaches in a red bowl. So there's no depth to
it. It's only part of a haiku, not a whole one. And just how important is that
red bowl? By drawing on my memory of that experience, I can introduce something
more meaningful:
ex-lover's phone call--
the cloying smell
of rotten peaches
Isn't that more interesting? This next version wastes space and misses the
opportunity for resonance:
in the kitchen
the moldy smell
of rotten peaches
If I remove "in the kitchen," is the meaning of the haiku harmed? No.
Since one might expect to find fruit in the kitchen, the location doesn't bring
anything to the haiku. That first line is only unnecessary information, taking
up space that could be used for another independent image. Like this:
end of the affair
the moldy smell
of rotten peaches
This next one has the same flaw -- the first line doesn't carry its own weight:
after dinner
the drone of a wasp
above rotten peaches
There is very little there to evoke an emotional response from readers.
Including this from the experience should have a more meaningful effect:
his latest lie--
the drone of a wasp
above rotten peaches
Now this:
bright sun
light fills
the peach orchard
It's all the same thing, and cause and effect as well: the sun is bright,
therefore (sun)light fills the orchard. "Sun" and "light"
are redundant. It is a one-part haiku. It can even be written as a single scene,
in one sentence:
Bright sun(light) fills the peach orchard.
I believe that the haiku, currently simply a linear statement, can be much
improved by the addition of another, independent part. There was something else
present during my experience that continues to be very meaningful for me:
Mama's song
morning sun fills
the peach orchard
Adding another image or topic that is independent from the rest of the verse
makes it more interesting, and invites readers to share the author's insight and
emotions or to make a discovery of their own.
Although the classic construction is dominant in my own haiku writing and
teaching, I do not mean for you to think that I believe it is the exact
structure we should use for every haiku we write forever and ever; however, it
is very important that beginners understand why the classic construction is so
often advocated, and to be able to write haiku in that form.
We have to start somewhere to solve a haiku problem, or to write a haiku from
scratch. The classic construction is traditional, tried and true, with sound
reasoning behind its success. Of course, every haiku "moment" is
different, and we should choose the poem's structure carefully. If we do choose
the classic form, then we are likely to recognize the main part of our
experience, and we'll also get some independent elements in there, which will
work toward creating a
meaningful, resonant haiku.
CREDIBILITY
When I say "credibility" here, I am not referring to the honesty of an
author: Did he REALLY teach Pygmies how to skin an antelope? Is she REALLY
developing a cold vaccine in her spare time? Instead, I am talking about
semantics, construction, and how something that works in prose may not work for
haiku purposes -- in other words, may not be entirely credible. I'll look for
examples from my own files.
deserted beach
the girl jumps over
each little wave
Well, now. Deserted? I don't think so. There's that little girl, not to mention
whoever observed and wrote the haiku. And does she really jump over each and
every wave?
deserted beach
a herring gull hovers
over picnic trash
Umm, empty of humans maybe. Sure, someone may be looking at an empty beach
through binoculars from a mile away. But "deserted" is such a strong
word with definite connotations of abandonment and forsaking, perhaps it's not
the best adjective to use for a beach that is simply not populated with humans
at the moment.
lonely night--
again she starts to empty
the empty trash can
If "she" is alone, who is there observing "her"? If this
poem is about my experience being alone, not someone else's experience, then in
this instance, it would be better to write in first person. "Lonely
night--/again I start to empty/the empty trash can"
Enough talking trash. How about this:
daylight moon--
a coal miner hums Strauss
deep within the earth
While I find it perfectly plausible that a coal miner hums a waltz tune, I
question the notion of his seeing the daylight moon at the same time he is deep
inside the earth. Let's say the author is not the coal miner, and is on the
earth's surface, looking at the moon. Can he/she really hear the humming that is
way, way down in the coal mine?
On the other hand, this IS credible:
approaching storm
she stares in silence
at the fallen cake
Sure, this is an inside scene, but it's certainly possible to be aware of
changes in the weather while inside a building: windows, open doors, dropping or
rising temperature, sounds of wind and thunder, etc.
More food for thought:
red plums
afraid of being swatted
the bees move aside
Now it looks like plums have emotions, and the author is a mind reader -- not
only of insects, but of fruit as well! This is the actual observation, and more
plausible:
red plums
her steady hand slips
between the bees
(Ferris Gilli; The Heron's Nest, Vol II: Nov 2000)
How about this?
gossiping at noon--
a small frog climbs
into the laundry tub
I don't think so . . . unless it's Kermit! This is a case in which the context
of one line spills over into the next line, attaching itself to the subject
and/or action of that line. This can occur IN SPITE OF PUNCTUATION indicating a
break, as it does here. Adding punctuation does not always correct the problem.
However, with a bit of rewriting, the flaw will come out in the wash:
back-fence gossip
a small frog climbs
into the laundry tub
Can you think of other examples that push the credibility boundaries? Sometimes
haiku that are meant to be serious get a laugh because of the spill-over effect,
or because the combination of two images or actions in the same haiku are just
not believable; when this happens, the effectiveness of the real meaning of the
poem is lost for the reader. Having once perceived a serious haiku to be
hilarious or just not credible, it is often then difficult for the reader to
ever take it seriously.
I propose an exercise in demonstrating what NOT to do when writing haiku. It
will be fun and perhaps a source of learning to post some of our haiku that we
now realize stretch credibility. As long as we keep in mind that we are
demonstrating a technique that is TO BE AVOIDED, we can even make up examples,
just for fun.